Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming
  • Original Article

    Roofing contractors operating in Tennessee will have to provide residents whose homes are damaged due to tornadoes and other storms with more information about their company and about their rights to cancel contracts under a new law.

    Gov. Bill Haslam recently signed a law that comes into response to widespread complaints from homeowners following a number of severe storms that caused widespread damage in the state during the last couple of years.

    In 2011, a number of tornadoes swept through the Midwest and South causing billions of damage. A hail storm that passed through in the Knoxville and Nashville later that year also damaged many homes and businesses.

    As a result, the state was flooded with out-of-state roofing contractors who along with some in-state roofers or individuals posing as roofers reportedly took advantage of homeowners.

    Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance spokesperson Christopher Garrett said that the department doesn’t specifically track roofing complaints. However, he said, the department did hear from more homeowners concerning repairs.

    “As far as statistics go, the Contractors Board received an increase in home improvement complaints from victims of the 2011 storms,” said Garrett.

    Sponsored by Sen. Bill Ketron (R-Murfreesboro), SB2714/HB 2915 requires that roofing contractors whose work is covered by an insurer must provide a homeowner with their address, telephone number, license registration, email address, and a detailed description of all damage and repairs.

    The contract must also contain a form notifying homeowners of their right to cancel a contract within three days after signing and/or receiving a written statement from their insurer that the contract is not a covered claim. Once a contract is cancelled, roofing contractors have 10 business days to return any payments to the homeowner, except for emergency repairs.

    Roofing contractors or their agents are also prohibited from telling homeowners they can negotiate a claim with an insurer unless they are also a licensed public adjuster.

    Any violations of these laws would be covered under Tennessee’s Consumer Protection Act of 1977.

    Frank Barrett, owner of the roofing firm, Barrett Co. in Knoxville, said that fraud is endemic in the roofing business especially as contractors and other individuals hit hard by the downturn in the construction industry scramble for any work available. He said his company runs television ads in East Tennessee warning homeowners about roofing contractor fraud and advising them to check a contractor’s reference and the Better Business bureau for any complaints before hiring a company.

    But most important, he said, homeowners should not give a roofer money upfront. That is especially the case when homeowners receive a check from an insurance company to pay repairs and end up handing it over to a roofer who says he needs it to buy materials only to never show up again.

    “Some people are just knocking on the door and tearing up a roof saying it needs to be fix and then just stealing money,” said Barrett. “No one should get paid until the work is done.”

    Barrett also said that homeowners are often unaware of what their homeowners policy covers. He said some insurance companies are neglecting to inform homeowners that they may be required to pay a high deductible to complete repairs.

    Dave Dodson, owner of the Tamko Building Products in Knoxville, said he supports efforts to crackdown on fraud, but is unsure how the state will enforce the new law since the state has no jurisdiction over out-of-state roofers. However, he said out-of-state contractors are needed given the magnitude of the storms that are frequent occurrences in the state.

    “When you have the kind of storms we had in Knoxville you had to have out-of-state contractors, the locals could not get it done,” Dodson said.

    The insurance industry’s Property Casualty Insurers Association of America came out strongly in favor of the bill and praised lawmakers for taking steps to rein-in contractors and ensure that consumers and insurers are not being taken advantage of.

    “After severe weather there are always some crooked contractors who descend upon neighborhoods and take advantage of unsuspecting homeowners,” said PCI vice president Ann Weber. “While the vast majority of contractors are honest, reputable business people, states across the country took positive steps to crack down on these storm chasing contractors, particularly from out of state, who use questionable solicitation and business tactics.”

    Other States Take Action

    Tennessee is not alone when it comes to cracking down on contractor fraud.

    Iowa lawmakers recently approved a similar bill that is now awaiting Gov. Terry Branstad’s signature.

    Arizona, Colorado, Indiana, Nebraska, Kentucky, and South Dakota have also approved measures to increase consumer protections against roofing contractor fraud.

  • We at AAPIA appreciate NAPIA’s attempt to clear up their position on fee caps, since maybe you have been as confused as we are about NAPIA’s actual position.  The latest email communication from counsel Brian Goodman dated Friday March 1st, states that “My letter of Jan 2 supported the planned 12.5% fee cap….. NAPIA, like the New Jersey Association came out in support of this proposed fee cap. I do not regard a 12.5% fee cap as being too small.”  However, the recent NAPIA legislative blog states quite emphatically that “we do not advocate or lobby for fee caps”.  NAPIA LEGISLATIVE BLOG Setting Standards by Supporting State Statutes By Brian S. Goodman, Esq., NAPIA Counsel, PESSIN & KATZ, P.A Wednesday, February 20, 2013
        
    We at AAPIA are understandably befuddled by NAPIA’s position.  NAPIA is lobbying and advocating for fee caps in New Jersey. The recent email cited above does lobby for fee caps, and just a few weeks ago NAPIA sent a letter to Assemblyman Green in New Jersey, lobbying and advocating for him to amend his Bill in New Jersey to impose a 12.5% fee cap:

    “We have carefully reviewed the position of the New Jersey Association of Public Insurance Adjusters, advocating a 12.5% fee cap, identical to the one in force in New York.  This would mean that there is a statuary cap of 12.5% of any gross insurance settlement from dollar one, which works well in New York and other states.  We are in complete agreement and support of this legislative amendment and wanted to get a letter to you articulating our support for the position of the New Jersey Association.” Letter to Assemblyman Green, dated January 2, 2013

    This amendment was not part of the original Bill, which was drafted by Assemblyman Green in response to Superstorm Sandy issues, and was not proposed by the Department of Banking and Insurance.  This was an amendment that sprang from the collective minds and pens of the NJ Association of Public Insurance Adjusters and NAPIA.  This position on fee caps was presented by the Board of NJPIA with a marginal vote of the Board and was never brought to the membership of the Association for a vote.  In fact, Jonathan Wilkowsky, counsel to NJPIA publicly stated at the NJPIA general membership meeting that this matter did not require the full vote of the membership, and that the Board had the authority to lobby for a 12.5% fee cap in New Jersey, which will greatly harm the consumers of New Jersey.  
       
    Response to this Bill from public adjusters has been overwhelmingly negative.  Perhaps NAPIA should send a letter to the legislature withdrawing their support if they want a law that is “fair and reasonable to the profession and the consumer”, as they profess.  NAPIA legislative blog. 2-20-13, (see above link).
       
    We have been consistent in our position.  The fee caps proposed by NAPIA and NJPIA will hurt the public adjusters and the consumers of New Jersey since public adjusters will not be able to help those with small claims. We appeal to you as members of NAPIA and NJPIA to contact the current Board and challenge them to defend their reasons for advocating for fee caps which will hurt their industry and the policyholders they are supposed to represent, and to instead support only laws that truly are fair and reasonable to all concerned.
       
    Please support our efforts to defeat S 2472.

    American Association of Public Insurance Adjusters

  • Just in time for Hurricane Sandy, Virginia will require all public insurance adjusters to obtain licenses from the state starting January 1, 2013. Governor Bob McDonnell (R)—who launched an initiative to identify and eliminate unnecessary regulation last week—signed the bill, which passed both houses unanimously, into law in April. (READ MORE)

Follow AAPIA

        

Our Sponsors